🔒 Approaches to Assessing Design and Technology capability: what the research says

Talking D&T

Subscriber-only episode

Send me a message.

In this week's subscription episode, I unpack the complexities of assessing design and technology capability, emphasising the significance of real-time assessments. Using published literature, I question England's current non-examined assessment (NEAs - coursework) approach
Listen in and be inspired to rethink how we evaluate our students' grasp of design and technological knowledge.
(Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)
Links/ Mentioned in the episode
R Kimbell, & K Stables, Researching design learning: issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Springer, 2008.
R. Kimbell, Examining the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) as an assessment tool in educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Volume 32, pages 1515 to1529.
Join my online workshop on 6 November at 4pm to prepare your response to the government's curriculum review. Get insights, discuss key issues, and learn how to submit your views effectively. Your expertise matters - make it count before the 22 November deadline!
Register NOW!

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'
Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.
If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.
If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.
If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

Hoofdstukken

1. Approaches to Assessing Design and Technology capability: what the research says (00:00:00)

2. Assessing Design and Technology Capability (00:00:55)

3. Learning Context and Challenges in Education (00:11:48)