))
Explainer 55 - 10 Years On: The Impact and Effects of AMP vs. Myriad
Manage episode 365871887 series 3276400
Inhoud geleverd door The Federalist Society. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door The Federalist Society of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc. a case that would ban attempts to patent naturally occurring DNA sequences.
Now, ten years down the line with a decade of hindsight, Dr. Roger Klein, who played a central role as an expert, advisor, and spokesperson for the Association for Molecular Pathology in AMP v. Myriad, joins us to discuss this important case. In this Explainer we discuss the context surrounding this case, the debates that arose, and the impact this rule had across the past 10 years.
Featuring:
*******
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
…
continue reading
Now, ten years down the line with a decade of hindsight, Dr. Roger Klein, who played a central role as an expert, advisor, and spokesperson for the Association for Molecular Pathology in AMP v. Myriad, joins us to discuss this important case. In this Explainer we discuss the context surrounding this case, the debates that arose, and the impact this rule had across the past 10 years.
Featuring:
- Dr. Roger D. Klein, Faculty Fellow, Center for Law, Science & Innovation Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
*******
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
375 afleveringen
Delen
