))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 19. Algorithmic System Reviews: Substantive vs. Controls Testing
Manage episode 462005823 series 3594717
Inhoud geleverd door Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.
Spoken by a human version of this article.
- Knowing the basics of substantive testing vs. controls testing can help you determine if the review will meet your needs.
- Substantive testing directly identifies errors or unfairness, while controls testing evaluates governance effectiveness. The results/conclusions are different.
- Understanding these differences can also help you anticipate the extent of your team's involvement during the review process.
Links
This article details a (largely) substantive testing method for accuracy reviews.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
27 afleveringen
Delen
