Artwork

Inhoud geleverd door Wired Ivy. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Wired Ivy of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Ga offline met de app Player FM !

Made to Measure (Dan Marcucci & Kieran Lindsey)

52:55
 
Delen
 

Manage episode 320980801 series 2825848
Inhoud geleverd door Wired Ivy. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Wired Ivy of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

High-stakes academic assessments create conditions that motivate students to cheat. At the same time everyone wants a laudable level of academic integrity in higher learning. Fair or not, for many years there has been a dismissive accusation that online learning was particularly vulnerable to massive cheating. Then, when universities made the wholesale emergency pivot from in-person to virtual classrooms in March 2020, there was a corresponding and predictable uptick in anxiety over how to prevent cheating when the instructor wasn’t even in the same physical location as the learners.

This all conveniently ignores the fact that ensuring academic integrity has been a perennial goal and challenge in all forms of education, regardless of the mode of delivery.

Test proctoring software and plagiarism checkers are offered as high-tech solutions to what has been framed as a problem created by technology. We will set aside, for the moment, legitimate apprehensions raised by these software solutions – collection of bio-metric data, spyware and privacy, promoting a surveillance culture, malware vulnerabilities, to name but a few.

The important point is this focus on technology is a distraction from the underlying problem. High-tech fixes only encourage an arms race where students improve their methods, and educators increase their policing tactics. It doesn’t mitigate the reason for cheating – we included in the show notes links to research about this.

But academic integrity shouldn’t begin with Crime and Punishment, it should start with Sense and Sensibility. What if, rather than trying to win an academic integrity skirmish, we make assessment activities that promote the original learning objectives?

  continue reading

Hoofdstukken

1. INTRO (00:00:00)

2. PREFACE (00:00:45)

3. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & CHEATING IN ONLINE CLASSES (00:03:10)

4. TYING ASSESSMENTS TO LEARNING OBJECTIVES (00:07:12)

5. ASSESSING PERFORMANCE OR MASTERY (00:09:26)

6. BEYOND PROCTORS & SPYWARE (00:12:24)

7. ATTENDANCE AS ASSESSMENT (00:13:41)

8. EMBARGOING CONTENT (00:16:17)

9. MICRO ASSESSMENTS (00:18:50)

10. ASSESSING DISCUSSIONS (00:21:41)

11. NEW APPROACHES TO WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS (00:27:52)

12. CONTRACT CHEATING & PLAGIARISM (00:28:03)

13. WRITING ASSIGNMENTS AS COLLABORATIVE WORK (00:33:15)

14. BROADENING THE DEFINITION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY (00:36:30)

15. ASSESSING SKILLS (00:37:21)

16. DEMONSTRATION OF MASTERY (00:41:05)

17. ASSESSING EXAMS (00:43:49)

18. COLLABORATIVE EXAMS (00:47:21)

19. A CHALLENGE TO WIRED IVY LISTENERS (00:50:43)

20. OUTRO (00:52:03)

43 afleveringen

Artwork
iconDelen
 
Manage episode 320980801 series 2825848
Inhoud geleverd door Wired Ivy. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Wired Ivy of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

High-stakes academic assessments create conditions that motivate students to cheat. At the same time everyone wants a laudable level of academic integrity in higher learning. Fair or not, for many years there has been a dismissive accusation that online learning was particularly vulnerable to massive cheating. Then, when universities made the wholesale emergency pivot from in-person to virtual classrooms in March 2020, there was a corresponding and predictable uptick in anxiety over how to prevent cheating when the instructor wasn’t even in the same physical location as the learners.

This all conveniently ignores the fact that ensuring academic integrity has been a perennial goal and challenge in all forms of education, regardless of the mode of delivery.

Test proctoring software and plagiarism checkers are offered as high-tech solutions to what has been framed as a problem created by technology. We will set aside, for the moment, legitimate apprehensions raised by these software solutions – collection of bio-metric data, spyware and privacy, promoting a surveillance culture, malware vulnerabilities, to name but a few.

The important point is this focus on technology is a distraction from the underlying problem. High-tech fixes only encourage an arms race where students improve their methods, and educators increase their policing tactics. It doesn’t mitigate the reason for cheating – we included in the show notes links to research about this.

But academic integrity shouldn’t begin with Crime and Punishment, it should start with Sense and Sensibility. What if, rather than trying to win an academic integrity skirmish, we make assessment activities that promote the original learning objectives?

  continue reading

Hoofdstukken

1. INTRO (00:00:00)

2. PREFACE (00:00:45)

3. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & CHEATING IN ONLINE CLASSES (00:03:10)

4. TYING ASSESSMENTS TO LEARNING OBJECTIVES (00:07:12)

5. ASSESSING PERFORMANCE OR MASTERY (00:09:26)

6. BEYOND PROCTORS & SPYWARE (00:12:24)

7. ATTENDANCE AS ASSESSMENT (00:13:41)

8. EMBARGOING CONTENT (00:16:17)

9. MICRO ASSESSMENTS (00:18:50)

10. ASSESSING DISCUSSIONS (00:21:41)

11. NEW APPROACHES TO WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS (00:27:52)

12. CONTRACT CHEATING & PLAGIARISM (00:28:03)

13. WRITING ASSIGNMENTS AS COLLABORATIVE WORK (00:33:15)

14. BROADENING THE DEFINITION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY (00:36:30)

15. ASSESSING SKILLS (00:37:21)

16. DEMONSTRATION OF MASTERY (00:41:05)

17. ASSESSING EXAMS (00:43:49)

18. COLLABORATIVE EXAMS (00:47:21)

19. A CHALLENGE TO WIRED IVY LISTENERS (00:50:43)

20. OUTRO (00:52:03)

43 afleveringen

Tous les épisodes

×
 
Loading …

Welkom op Player FM!

Player FM scant het web op podcasts van hoge kwaliteit waarvan u nu kunt genieten. Het is de beste podcast-app en werkt op Android, iPhone en internet. Aanmelden om abonnementen op verschillende apparaten te synchroniseren.

 

Korte handleiding