Channel Shenanigans: From Turkey to Tea Time Alternatives
Manage episode 465749810 series 2966694
This is a podcast where we try and persuade or entertain, inspire, and basically inform ourselves and you through conversation.
Paula, a listener from Norfolk, England asks the first question for Stuart and William to mull over. It’s a long question so we have put it in a separate document:Paula’s Question
Stuart and William kick things off with a spirited debate on why folks are moving in the first place. Stuart suggests it might be because of the perception that the UK offers more than other safe countries. William chimes in with something more fundamental - English is a widely spoken language (plus, who doesn’t love tea and crumpets?).
William then points to the right-wing rhetoric that claims people coming to the UK are just here to drain resources like an uninvited guest who eats all your snacks and leaves the toilet seat up.
Stuart goes on to talk about how the states these people pass through could act like a human sponge, absorbing everyone in transit (although that sounds like a superhero gone wrong). France wants the UK to do its part but Stuart wonders if France is pulling its weight.
Stuart feels we need to get practicing at absorbing and channeling migration. Let's see this as a practice run for what's to come. Practice makes perfect, right?
William points out that France has taken in more migrants than the UK and highlights the lack of legal routes for asylum seekers to enter the country. He believes the real issue isn’t that they’re all coming here but rather that it's the only route they can take, leaving them at the mercy of gangs (like a bad road trip with a shady GPS).
William explains the difference between an asylum seeker and an illegal immigrant and says the issue of small boats crossing the Channel has been blown out of proportion. The number of people crossing the Channel in a year could fit into a football stadium.
Stuart’s action plan? Spend a bit of time thinking about this openly and remember, the media from all angles is trying to convince you of their way of thinking. Just like those salesmen who insist you need a vacuum that also makes smoothies.
Samantha, another listener, this time from Cumbria, England puts forward the second question: “Is there always an alternative explanation?”
Stuart kicks things off with, there's always an alternative. It doesn’t mean it’s correct, but hey, it’s like trying on funky hats—worth exploring! Because stepping outside our perspective is like upgrading from fuzzy logic to sharp clarity.
Stuart then explores the barriers to accepting alternative explanations. It could be ego or the fear of being wrong, or maybe just the dread of finding out pineapple does belong on pizza.
William’s action plan? Check out other sources. It’s like a treasure hunt, except the treasure is the truth and not a dusty old map.
Stuart recommends reading a Maeve Binchy book. She writes from the perspective of people’s shared challenges. Think of it as a literary group therapy session with a dash of charm.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to [email protected]
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities:change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair:justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/thepeoplescountrysideenvironmentaldebatepodcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
572 afleveringen