Artwork

Inhoud geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Ga offline met de app Player FM !

Niall Ferguson on Catastrophe

36:14
 
Delen
 

Manage episode 292929349 series 1423621
Inhoud geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?


Talking Points:


Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu.

  • However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible.
  • Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.

When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing.

  • A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences.
  • We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.

What did we get wrong about the COVID response?

  • Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that.
  • The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.

The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one.

  • The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions.
  • Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

382 afleveringen

Artwork

Niall Ferguson on Catastrophe

TALKING POLITICS

3,103 subscribers

published

iconDelen
 
Manage episode 292929349 series 1423621
Inhoud geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door Catherine Carr and David Runciman of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?


Talking Points:


Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu.

  • However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible.
  • Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.

When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing.

  • A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences.
  • We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.

What did we get wrong about the COVID response?

  • Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that.
  • The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.

The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one.

  • The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions.
  • Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

  continue reading

382 afleveringen

Όλα τα επεισόδια

×
 
Loading …

Welkom op Player FM!

Player FM scant het web op podcasts van hoge kwaliteit waarvan u nu kunt genieten. Het is de beste podcast-app en werkt op Android, iPhone en internet. Aanmelden om abonnementen op verschillende apparaten te synchroniseren.

 

Korte handleiding