Artwork

Inhoud geleverd door The Federalist Society. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door The Federalist Society of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Ga offline met de app Player FM !

Is There a "Death Squad" at the U.S. Patent Office?: Examining the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

 
Delen
 

Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
Inhoud geleverd door The Federalist Society. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door The Federalist Society of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 afleveringen

Artwork
iconDelen
 
Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
Inhoud geleverd door The Federalist Society. Alle podcastinhoud, inclusief afleveringen, afbeeldingen en podcastbeschrijvingen, wordt rechtstreeks geüpload en geleverd door The Federalist Society of hun podcastplatformpartner. Als u denkt dat iemand uw auteursrechtelijk beschermde werk zonder uw toestemming gebruikt, kunt u het hier beschreven proces https://nl.player.fm/legal volgen.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 afleveringen

Alle afleveringen

×
 
Loading …

Welkom op Player FM!

Player FM scant het web op podcasts van hoge kwaliteit waarvan u nu kunt genieten. Het is de beste podcast-app en werkt op Android, iPhone en internet. Aanmelden om abonnementen op verschillende apparaten te synchroniseren.

 

Korte handleiding